ClickCease Union Carbide & Asbestos | Compensation Options for Victims
Skip to content
Thousands of families helped
Millions paid to victims & families
Time is limited to claim your payment

 Union Carbide

Union Carbide operated an asbestos mine from the early 1960s to the mid-1980s, putting workers, their families, and local residents at risk of asbestos exposure and related illnesses.

Injured workers and their family members impacted by Union Carbide’s asbestos-related negligence may be eligible for financial compensation to help with treatment costs, living expenses, loss of consortium, and more.

Apply For Compensation
Union Carbide Logo
Payouts to Victims
+$1 Billion
Claims Filed
Thousands
Main Exposure Window
1960s–1980s
Asbestos Products
Calidria asbestos
Occupations at Highest Risk
Miners, mill workers, drywallers, insulators, and construction workers
Fact checked and legally reviewed by Samuel Meirowitz Esq. • Contributor & Legal Advisor

Key Facts About Union Carbide & Asbestos Risks

  • Compensation: Compensation: Union Carbide does not have an asbestos trust fund. Injured workers and their loved ones can seek compensation through a personal injury or wrongful death lawsuit.
  • Asbestos Mines: Union Carbide operated an asbestos mine in King City, California, selling the asbestos it mined and processed under the brand name Calidria.
  • Occupations: Union Carbide asbestos miners have the highest risk of asbestos-related diseases. Individuals who worked with products made using Calidria brand asbestos, such as construction workers, are also at risk.
  • Get Help Today: Contact our team of experts for a free case evaluation to see if you may qualify for compensation.

Highest-Risk Occupations

The asbestos extraction at the King City mine exposed hundreds of Union Carbide employees to asbestos between 1963 and 1985. As a result of their work, these individuals faced significant risks from direct contact, likely inhaling cancer-causing asbestos particles that cause conditions like mesothelioma.

Who Is at Highest Risk for Exposure?

Although anyone exposed to Union Carbide’s asbestos products or its Calidria brand asbestos faces increased risk from repeated exposure, certain occupations are at even greater risk. Miners and mill workers, who directly handled raw asbestos, are especially vulnerable.

Miners

Asbestos miners are among the most at-risk for developing asbestos-related illnesses because they handled the material directly during mining operations. Daily exposure in poorly ventilated conditions significantly increased their likelihood of developing diseases such as mesothelioma. 

Despite knowing the dangers, Union Carbide failed to adequately warn many miners about the serious health risks associated with asbestos exposure. 

Mill Workers

Mill workers employed at Union Carbide plants where the Calidria product line was manufactured were continually exposed to fine asbestos powder. Asbestos fibers can remain airborne for hours, often floating visibly in the air in areas with high concentrations or poor air flow. Many such workers later developed serious asbestos‑related diseases. 

Family Members Exposed to Secondhand Asbestos

Victims of secondhand asbestos exposure, which often occurs during the laundering of contaminated work clothes, may be eligible to pursue legal action against Union Carbide for its negligent use of asbestos. Surviving dependents may also be entitled to compensation through a wrongful death lawsuit.

Check Your Compensation Eligibility Now

Step 1 of 3

Were you or your family member diagnosed with any of the following?

Step 3 of 3

Based on your answers, it seems like you may have a potential claim. How can we get in touch to confirm your eligibility?

Contact me by *
By clicking “Start My Claim Now,” you expressly consent to being contacted by Mesotheliomafund.com via call or text/SMS messages using an automated dialing platform with information regarding mesothelioma-related services. Msg. and data rates may apply. Your consent to such contact/marketing is not required for purchase of services. You also agree to the Mesotheliomafund.com Disclaimer including the agreement to arbitrate disputes.
Your information will be kept private

Union Carbide Asbestos Products

Union Carbide did not directly manufacture products containing asbestos. Instead, it provided asbestos to other companies for their manufacturing processes. 

The company sold Calidria asbestos to manufacturers in the following industries:

Companies known to have used Union Carbide’s Calidria include Georgia-Pacific, Kelly-Moore Paint Co., and U.S. Gypsum. 

Evidence shows that Union Carbide leadership ignored health warnings and did not update safety manuals to inform workers of the dangers of asbestos.

Top Asbestos-Containing Products

  • SG‑210 Calidria

Fact

Union Carbide executives reportedly marketed Calidria as a uniquely safe asbestos product. However, an internal memo uncovered during a lawsuit by Kelly-Moore Paint Co. in the 1970s revealed the company’s strategy to “make hay while the sun shines,” pushing to ramp up production and distribute asbestos more rapidly, despite the associated risks.

Source: KKCOMCON

Securing Compensation From Union Carbide

Individuals who developed asbestos-related diseases due to Union Carbide’s actions can seek justice and financial compensation. Expert legal guidance can help you and your family navigate the challenges of an asbestos lawsuit.

Additionally, individuals eligible for compensation from Union Carbide may be eligible for other forms of compensation, such as VA benefits, workers’ compensation, and more. We can help you determine your eligibility for free and ensure you are aware of all your compensation options.

Filing a Lawsuit

Union Carbide has never filed for bankruptcy or established an asbestos trust fund. Victims seeking compensation from the company must file a lawsuit in civil court.

There are two primary types of lawsuits that victims of Union Carbide asbestos exposure can file when seeking compensation:

  • Personal injury lawsuit: This type allows living victims of asbestos exposure to seek compensation for their losses.
  • Wrongful death lawsuit: This type allows dependents or family members of deceased asbestos exposure victims to recover damages for the loss of their loved one.

Many lawsuits end in settlements without ever going to trial. Accepting an out-of-court settlement gives victims access to relatively quick compensation. Unlike a trial verdict, a settlement agreement is legally binding and cannot be appealed once both parties have agreed to it.

Key Requirements to File

  • Diagnosis: Claimants must have a diagnosis of an asbestos-related illness (such as mesothelioma, lung cancer, or asbestosis) OR proof of a wrongful death from an asbestos-related illness. 
  • Proof of exposure: Documentation linking the victim’s illness to asbestos exposure from Union Carbide through employment or use of their products is required. 
  • Statute of limitations: Potential claimants have a limited time to file a claim. Deadlines vary by state, with most averaging just two to three years, so it’s critical to move quickly.

Fact

NEED HELP FILING A LAWSUIT AGAINST UNION CARBIDE?

Because Union Carbide’s exposure footprint is so broad, it can be difficult to understand if you have a claim against them. If you think you may have a case, we can help you determine your eligibility for compensation and file your claim for free. Our experts handle all the legal details to get you and your family the compensation you deserve with no hassle or upfront fees. Help Me File

Notable Lawsuits Against Union Carbide

You don’t need to have worked directly for Union Carbide or lived near the company’s mine to qualify for compensation. Because Union Carbide’s asbestos was widely used across various industries and products, you may be eligible to pursue legal action if your asbestos-related disease can be traced back to the company.

If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with an asbestos-related disease due to asbestos exposure from Union Carbide’s activity or from products made using asbestos sold by Union Carbide, we can provide you with a free case assessment. Contact us today.

Major Verdicts

$13.5 million

Paper Mill Worker

Robert Conner worked at the Longview Fiber paper mill in Longview, Washington, handling raw chrysotile asbestos bags and working near paper‑making machines between the 1960s and 1980s. Following his death from mesothelioma, his wife, Dorothy Conner, was awarded $13.5 million in a 2024 wrongful death lawsuit.

$24 million

Homebuilder

The Izell family filed a lawsuit against Union Carbide after Bobbie Izell was diagnosed with mesothelioma, a result of exposure to asbestos-containing joint compound made using Calidria asbestos. The court found Union Carbide 65% responsible for Bobbie’s mesothelioma and ordered it to pay $6 million in compensatory damages and $18 million in punitive damages.

$7.2 million

Plumber

Plumber Larry Stewart was diagnosed with mesothelioma due to exposure to Union Carbide asbestos in a joint compound used in drywall. Stewart and his family filed a lawsuit against the corporation, and the court found Union Carbide 85% responsible for Stewart’s asbestos exposure and ordered the company to pay a total of $7.2 million to the Stewart family.

$6.6 million

Construction Worker

After developing peritoneal mesothelioma from handling construction products containing Union Carbide’s SG-210 Calidria product, William Aubin sued the company. The jury found Union Carbide responsible for damages due to negligence and defective design, ordering the corporation to pay the plaintiff $6.6 million.

Union Carbide’s Involvement With Asbestos

Union Carbide produced chemicals and polymers used in various household, industrial, and agricultural products. Between 1963 and 1985, the company operated an asbestos mine in King City, California.

Union Carbide mined and processed asbestos. They then sold it under the Calidria brand to other companies for use in manufacturing products, such as paint, cement, wall coatings, and adhesives. 

Internal documents and litigation reveal that the company’s leadership was aware of the dangers of asbestos but downplayed the risks to purchasers. This negligence has resulted in numerous lawsuits, as the profound human impact became evident, with thousands of workers developing serious asbestos-related illnesses.

Dow Chemical purchased Union Carbide in 1999 for $11.6 billion. 

Contact Us for a Free Case Assessment

Union Carbide mined, processed, and sold asbestos under the brand name Calidria. Manufacturers across numerous industries used Union Carbide asbestos in their products, creating a large exposure footprint. 

If you or a loved one was exposed to asbestos through Union Carbide, you may be entitled to compensation. Determining your eligibility for financial relief due to asbestos-related diseases can be complex, but our team is here to help.

We offer free resources and personalized case reviews to help you understand your rights and navigate the legal process. By contacting us, you’ll receive expert guidance tailored to your situation. 
We are committed to supporting you throughout your journey. Contact our team today to determine your eligibility for compensation and learn more about your potential case value, free of charge.

SUMMARY

Injured workers and their families—even those who never worked directly for Union Carbide but handled asbestos‑containing joint compounds, cement, paints, or adhesives made using its Calidria brand asbestos—could be eligible for legal compensation. The company does not have a trust fund, requiring claimants to pursue compensation through a personal injury or wrongful death lawsuit.

What is Union Carbide, and how was it linked to asbestos exposure?

Union Carbide mined and processed asbestos, selling the final product to other asbestos companies under the brand name Calidria. Its product was used to manufacture a wide variety of asbestos-containing products, including paint, insulation, adhesives, textiles, and more. 

How were Union Carbide workers exposed to asbestos?

People may have been exposed to asbestos through the mining or processing of raw asbestos. Others may have been exposed through asbestos-containing products made using Union Carbide’s Calidria asbestos. 

Who is most at risk from the company’s asbestos exposure?

Miners at Union Carbide mines and employees working in the company’s processing plants face a high risk of asbestos exposure. Others, such as carpenters, painters, drywallers, and construction workers, face risks from asbestos-containing products manufactured with Union Carbide asbestos.  

Can family members file a claim?

Family members may be eligible to file on their own behalf if they experienced secondary asbestos exposure. Surviving dependents may also qualify for compensation through a wrongful death lawsuit. 

What types of compensation are available? 

Victims of Union Carbide asbestos exposure may be able to file a personal injury or wrongful death lawsuit. Some may also qualify for compensation from other companies or in other forms, such as asbestos trust fund claims, VA benefits, workers’ compensation, and more. 

How can the Mesothelioma Fund help?

The Mesothelioma Fund can help you determine your eligibility for compensation for free. It only takes a few minutes to put you on the path to expert support and due compensation, with some qualified candidates getting initial payments in as little as 90 days. 

Profile Image for Samuel Meirowitz Esq.

Written & Legally Reviewed By

Samuel Meirowitz Esq. Attorney and On-Site Legal Advocate

Samuel Meirowitz is a member of the “Top 100 Trial Lawyers.” Mr. Meirowitz was named a “Rising Star” in 2013 & 2014 by Super Lawyers and then a Super Lawyer every year since 2016. In 2013, Mr. Meirowitz obtained what is believed to be the first multi-million-dollar asbestos verdict seen in more than two decades in a New York federal court. In that highly contentious matter, Mr. Meirowitz was able to convince the jury to hold a boiler manufacturer responsible for 60 percent of the $3.8 million awarded, despite the defendant’s attempt to escape all blame by pointing fingers at the plaintiff’s employer and the U.S. Navy (in which the plaintiff admirably served from 1966-70 during the Vietnam conflict). This verdict was upheld by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

Learn More

Sources